Positive Pressure Ventilation
Describe the physiological consequences of intermittent positive pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure.
Physiological effects of positive pressure ventilation are mostly related to the increased mean airway pressure. This is a function of:
- Ventilation mode
- Tidal volume and peak (and plateau) airway pressure
- Respiratory rate
- I:E ratio
- PEEP
PEEP has a much larger effect than the other factors.- PEEP is defined as a positive airway pressure at the end of expiration
- PEEP is distinct from positive airway pressure (which is not confined to a phase of the respiratory cycle) and CPAP (which is a mode of ventilation)
- iPEEP refers to intrinsic PEEP, auto PEEP or dynamic hyperinflation
iPEEP is PEEP generated by the patient, and occurs when expiration stops before the lung volume reaches FRC.- Application of external PEEP may limit the generation of iPEEP by maintaining airway patency in late expiration
Respiratory Effects
- Decreased work of breathing
- Decreased VO2
More important when work of breathing is high.
- Decreased VO2
- Alteration in anatomical/apparatus dead space
- Intubation typically reduces dead space, as the additional apparatus dead space is of smaller volume than the anatomical dead space it replaces
- Non-invasive ventilation masks cause a large increase in dead space
- Increases lung volume (and FRC, for PEEP) by an amount proportional to the compliance of the system
- Improves oxygenation via alveolar recruitment
- Improves lung compliance via alveolar recruitment, reducing work of breathing
- Elevated airway pressures may increase the proportion of West Zone 1 physiology and alveolar dead space
In healthy lungs an increase in the ratio is seen when PEEP exceeds 10-15cmH2O.
- Reduces airway resistance
Airway resistance decreases as lung volume increases.
Cardiovascular Effects
- Alteration in cardiac output
- PEEP and IPPV generally decrease CO via decreasing VR due to the increase in intrathoracic pressure.
Leads to reduction in RV filling pressure, LV filling, and CO.- This is the predominant reason why CO falls with the application of PEEP
In a well patient, CO falls by: - These changes are:
- More marked in hypovolaemia
Changes are reversed with volume expansion. - Less severe with poor lung compliance
Reduced compliance greatly reduces the effect of PEEP and IPPV on the vasculature, as the change in intrapleural pressure is reduced.
- More marked in hypovolaemia
- This is the predominant reason why CO falls with the application of PEEP
- LV preload may also be reduced due to increased RV afterload
- Reduced LV afterload due to reduced LV transmural pressure
In some cases, IPPV augments circulatory function by reducing LV afterload to a greater extent than preload.- Effects in a well patient are minimal, as PEEP is relatively small in magnitude compared to systemic arterial pressures
- In patients generating highly negative intrathoracic pressures, the LV transmural pressure can increase markedly, increasing LV afterload and reducing cardiac output
- PEEP and IPPV generally decrease CO via decreasing VR due to the increase in intrathoracic pressure.
- Changes to oxygen flux
PEEP will tend to improve PO2 whilst reducing CO.
- Changes to pulmonary vascular resistance and RV afterload
- If lung volume is lower than FRC, then PVR will reduce as PEEP stretches open extra-alveolar vessels
- Alveolar recruitment will reduce hypoxic-pulmonary vasoconstriction, further reducing PVR
- If lung volume is higher than FRC, then PVR will increase as PEEP compresses alveolar vessels
- Therefore, PEEP has variable effects on RV afterload depending on how it changes lung volume with respect to FRC
- If lung volume is lower than FRC, then PVR will reduce as PEEP stretches open extra-alveolar vessels
End-Organ Effects
- Reduced urine output due to:
- Reduced hepatic blood flow due to:
- Increased CVP and decreased CO lowering the pressure gradient for hepatic flow
- May result in circulation only intermittently throughout the cardiac cycle
- Increased CVP and decreased CO lowering the pressure gradient for hepatic flow
References
- Lumb A. Nunn's Applied Respiratory Physiology. 7th Edition. Elsevier. 2010.
- Luecke T, Pelosi P. Clinical review: Positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac output. Critical Care. 2005;9(6):607-621. doi:10.1186/cc3877.
- Yartsev, A. Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and it's consequences. Deranged Physiology.
- Yartsev, A. Positive Pressure and PEEP. Deranged Physiology.
- Yartsev, A. Indications and Contraindications for PEEP. Deranged Physiology.
- Yartsev, A. Effects of Positive Pressure and PEEP on Alveolar Volume. Deranged Physiology.
- Yartsev, A. [PEEP and Intrinsic PEEP}(http://www.derangedphysiology.com/main/core-topics-intensive-care/mechanical-ventilation-0/Chapter%202.1.6/peep-and-intrinsic-peep). Deranged Physiology.