Vapourisers
Describe the principles and safe operation of vapourisers
Delivery of gas that is fully saturated with anaesthetic agent would result in lethal doses being administered. The use of a vapouriser allows a safe dose of anaesthetic agent to be given. Vapourisers can be divided into:
- Variable bypass vapourisers
Air that is fully saturated with gas is mixed with a 'bypass' stream of gas, diluting the delivered concentration. Further subdivided into:- Plenum
Requires supra-atmospheric pressure to operate.- More accurate
- Draw-over
Driven by the patients inspiratory effort.- Portable
- Plenum
Variable Bypass Vapouriser
Variable bypass vapourisers aim to deliver the same concentration of anaesthetic agent over a range of flows. They achieve this by:
- Flow management
- Baffles and wicks increase the surface area of the liquid/gas interface, increasing the rate of vapourisation.
- Excessively high flow rates may result in gas not being fully saturated with agent when it exits the vapouriser stream
- These are less effective in draw-over vapourisers, as resistance must be minimised
- Baffles and wicks increase the surface area of the liquid/gas interface, increasing the rate of vapourisation.
- Temperature management
The SVP of volatile agents increases non-linearly as temperature increases. Temperature changes:- Occur through:
- Changes in ambient temperature
- Loss through latent heat of vapourisation
Liquid agent from the vapouriser will cool over the course of an anaesthetic.
- Are managed with:
- Temperature stabilisation
Use of materials with both a high thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity, allowing the vapourising chamber to buffer changes in surrounding temperature. - Temperature compensation
Adjusts flow into either the vapourising chamber or bypass chamber to account for changes in environmental temperature. Methods include:- Bimetallic strip
Metal strip which bends in response to environmental temperature, adjusting the amount of gas entering the vapourising chamber. - Aneroid bellows
Connect to a cone in the opening of the bypass chamber. As temperature decreases, the bellows contract and the cone partially obstructs the bypass channel.
- Bimetallic strip
- Temperature stabilisation
- Occur through:
Difference Between Plenum and Draw-Over Vapourisers
Plenum vapourisers are:
- More accurate
Designed to deliver accurate agent concentrations over a wide range (0.25-15L.min-1) of flow rates- Below 250ml.min-1 the resistance of the flow splitting valve becomes more significant, causing the amount of gas in the bypass stream to be higher than intended
- Above 15L.min-1 gas may not be fully saturated
- Heavier
Typically built of metals such as copper to maximise thermal stability. - High internal resistance
- Must be used out-of-circle
- Must be used with positive-pressure
Draw-Over Vapourisers are:
- Less accurate
- Less use of baffles and wicks to minimise inspiratory resistance
- Less thermally stable
- Oxford Minature Vapouriser does not have a bimetallic strip
- Oxford Minature Vapouriser uses glycol as a thermal buffer
Measured Flow Vapourisers
Measured flow vapourisers have a separate stream of agent-saturated gas that is added to the gas flow. This requires the device to:
- Measure fresh gas flow rate
- Adjust vapour-gas flow rate so the desired concentration is delivered
This system is used for the delivery of desflurane, as desflurane:
- Has a very high SVP
Requires high bypass flow rate to dilute to a clinically useful concentration. - Has a low boiling point
Intermittently boils at room temperature, which will cause large fluctuations in delivery:- Excessive agent delivery during boiling
This will lead to cooling due to the latent heat of vapourisation. - Cooled desflurane will have a much lower saturated vapour pressure
Significant under-delivery will then occur.
- Excessive agent delivery during boiling
The Tec6 vapouriser:
- Heats desflurane to 39°C
SVP of desflurane at this temperature is 1500mmHg. - Gaseous desflurane is then added to the fresh gas flow
The amount added depends on:- Desired concentration
- Fresh gas flow rate
As flow increases the resistance to flow of desflurane vapour decreases.
General Safety Features of Vapourisers
Agent specificity:
- Key indexed filling
- Pin indexed safety system connectors
- Colour coding of unit and agent containers
Single agent administration:
- Interlock mechanism
Prevents multiple vapourisers being turned on. - Single cartridge slot (Aladdin system)
Tipping and overfilling:
- Long vapourisation chamber inflow
- Heavy construction
- Transport modes
- Side filling and overflow ports
Anti-pumping:
- Check valves and long vapourisation chamber inflow prevent entrainment of vapouriser gas in the inflow of the bypass channel
Agent depletion:
- Filling gauges
- Low pressure alarms (Tec 6)
Other Factors Affecting Vapourisers
Carrier Gas Composition:
- Nitrous oxide and air are more viscous than oxygen
- This leads to decreased flow through the vapourising chamber when FiO2 is low
This effect is not clinically significant.
Altitude:
- Clinical effect of volatile agent is a function of their partial pressure in tissues
- As SVP is independent of atmospheric pressure, this is unchanged at altitude
A vapouriser set at 2% will deliver 4% gas at 0.5atm pressure, however as the atmospheric pressure is reduced the same partial pressure of vapour is delivered
The delivered concentration of an agent at altitude is given by the equation:
, where:- is the concentration of agent in the gas delivered to the patient
This must be multiplied by the atmospheric pressure to find the partial pressure of agent delivered to the patient. - is the concentration dialed up on the vapouriser
- is the atmospheric pressure where the vapouriser was calibrated
- is the atmospheric pressure where the vapouriser is being used
References
- Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Weiner-Kronish JP, Cohen NH, Young WL. Miller's Anaesthesia. 8th Ed (Revised). Elsevier Health Sciences.
- Boumphrey S, Marshall N. Understanding vapourizers. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. Volume 11, Issue 6, 1 December 2011, Pages 199–203,