# Risk and Odds

Understand the concepts of risk and Odds Ratio

## Risk

• Absolute Risk is the risk of an event occurring in the exposed group
• Relative Risk (or risk ratio) is the risk of an event occurring in the exposed group relative to the unexposed group.
• Absolute Risk Reduction is the decrease in risk provided by an exposure:
Is a clinically useful measure of the value of an intervention because contextualises the efficacy of the intervention with the prevalence of the outcome. ARR is better (more intuitively) expressed as:
• Number Needed to Treat (NNT) is the number of individuals who must receive a treatment to prevent one event:
• Relative Risk Reduction is the decrease in incidence provided by treatment. It is not as useful a measure of the value of an intervention, but drug companies like it because the numbers are bigger than absolute risk reduction.

## Odds

• Odds are the probability of an event happening compared to the probability of it not happening, usually expressed as a fraction
• The Odds Ratio is the ratio of the odds of the outcome occurring in the exposed compared to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed
• An OR < 1 suggests the risk is lower in the exposed group
• An OR > 1 suggests the risk is higher in the exposed group
• An OR = 1 suggests that the groups are equivalent
• In general, the OR overstates risk compared to the RR
• It is approximately equal to the RR when the outcome is rare (< 10%)
This is because when the event rate is small, the number of non-events in a group is very similar to the overall number of individuals in the group.
• It is used when:
• The denominator is uncertain, i.e.:
• In retrospective designs, such as case-control studies when patients with the disease were identified, and then exposures ascertained
• When it statistically appropriate (ORs are much easier to use in statistical tests), i.e.:
• Multivariate regression
• Systematic Reviews

## Risk versus Odds

Relative Risk and Odds Ratios are both methods of comparing the likelihood of an outcome occurring between two groups. The difference, and particularly the concept of odds ratios, are commonly confused. Relative risk tends be much more intuitive than odds ratios. Imagine a trial has been performed, where group A was exposed group:

• In group A, the mortality was 50%
• In group B, the mortality was 25%

The relative risk is intuitive:

The odds ratio is not:

A RR of 2 is intuitive, but the OR of 3 is not. Now, imagine another trial where:

• In group A, the mortality was 90%
• In group B, the mortality was 10%

The relative risk is 9, but the OR is 81!

So why use odds ratios at all? Odds ratios are:

• Required when research subjects are selected on the basis of outcome rather than the basis of exposure
• Used by many statistical tests because the log odds ratio is normally distributed, which is a mathematically useful property

Relative Risk has a weakness as well - it is dependent on how the question is framed. Using the first trial above, we calculated that RR for death was 2 and the OR was 3. Rather than calculating mortality, an alternative method could be to look at survival:

• In group A, the survival was 50%
• In group B, the survival was 75%

Note that the relative risk is not 0.5 (as you may initially assume), however the odds ratio is just the inverse of the previous value.

1. Myles PS, Gin T. Statistical methods for anaesthesia and intensive care. 1st ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.
2. Course notes from "Introduction to Biostats", University of Sydney, School of Public Health, circa 2013.
3. Simon S. Odds ratio vs. relative risk. "Steve's Attempt to Teach Statistics (StATS)". Children's Mercy Hospital, 2006.
4. Bland JM, Altman D. Bland J Martin, Altman Douglas G. The odds ratio. BMJ 2000; 320 :1468.
Last updated 2020-07-26